Surveillance and Society
Referee’s Report


Manuscript Title:

Reviewer’s Name:
Institution:
Email:
Fax:
Phone:

Date Sent:
Date Replied:


Recommendation:

I. Publish with only routine editing;
II. Accept but ask author to make minor changes as noted;
III. Accept, but ask the author to make major changes to be checked by the Editors;
IV. Ask  the author to make substantial changes and resubmit; 
V. Reject;
VI. Paper not suitable for Surveillance and Society but may be appropriate for an alternative journal (please suggest).


Assessment Grid:

Could you please indicate on the scale of 1-5 (5 being excellent/high – 1 being poor/low) your assessment of this contribution.


Advancement of new knowledge
Suitability of topic for S&S
Theoretical importance
Policy relevance
Readability and standard of English
Presentation and conformity to academic convention
Entertainment 


Confidential Comments for the Editors, Not the Author:

















Surveillance and Society
Referee’s Report

Manuscript Title:

Comments for the author(s)